The Eighth Regional Moot Court Competition

Subotica, 25-28. April 2014

Official records

PART I

Grades for the written briefs

Club	City	Application	Response	Total	Place
Vladimir Bayer	Zagreb	37	35	72	3
Zoran Kompanjet	Rijeka	38	38	76	1
Radomir Lukic	Novi Sad	33	33	66	6
Iudex	Sarajevo	33	35	68	5
Iustiniana Prima	Skopje	28	28	56	10
Discretio	Mostar	27	25	52	12
Universitas	Tuzla	29	32	61	8
Gavro Vukovic	Podgorica	31	31	62	7
Henrik Steska	Ljubljana	37	36	73	2
Iustitia	Nis	36	35	71	4
Nasciturus	Split	30	30	60	9
Dzemal Bijedic	Mostar	26	27	53	11

PART II

Draw

According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Iustitia”, Nis (71) “Henrik Steska”, Ljubljana (73), “Zoran Kompanjet”, Rijeka (76) and Club “Vladimir Bayer”, Zagreb (72) were placed in the first box. After the first draw Club “Henrik Steska” Ljubljana was selected for the leader of group A, Club “Zoran Kompanjet”, Rijeka for the leader of group B, Club “Vladimir Bayer”, Zagreb for the leader of group C and Club “Iustitia” Nis for the leader of group D.

According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Iudex” Sarajevo (68), „Radomir Lukic“, Novi Sad (66), “Gavro Vukovic”, Podgorica (62), and “Universitas”, Tuzla (61) were placed in the second box. After the second draw Club “Iudex” Sarajevo was selected for the group A, Club “Radomir Lukic”, Novi Sad for the group B, club “Universitas”, Tuzla for the group C and club “Gavro Vukovic” Podgorica for the group D.

According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Nasciturus”, Split (60), “Iustiniana Prima”, Skopje (56), “Dzemal Bijedic”, Mostar (53) and “Discretio”, Mostar (52) were placed in the third box. After the third draw Club “Dzemal Bijedic” Mostar was selected for the group A, Club “Iustiniana Prima”, Skopje for the group B, club “Nasciturus”, Split for the group C and club “Discretio” Mostar for the group D.

Groups/divisions

A

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Club “Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar)

B

Club”Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

C

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Club “Universitas” (Tuzla)

Club “Nasciturus” (Split)

D

Club “Iustitia” (Nis)

Club “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica)

Club “Discretio” (Mostar)

PART III

Matches in groups/divisions

(April 26)

Group A:

Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Respondent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Judges: Nenadić, Carić, Bašić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nenadić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Carić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Bašić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 23

Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 22

Group A:

Applicant: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Respondent: “Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar)

Judges: Zupančič, Popović, Bašić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Zupančič	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Popović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Bašić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 25

Respondent: “Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar) 20

Group A:

Applicant:“Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar)

Respondent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Judges: Nenadić, Carić, Govedarica

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nenadić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Carić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Govedarica	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant:“Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar) 21

Respondent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 24

Group B:

Applicant:“Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

Respondent: “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

Judges: Marijan, Nikolovska, Nikolić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Marijan	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Nikolić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant:“Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 20

Respondent: “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad) 25

Group B:

Applicant:“Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

Respondent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Judges: Martinović, Nikolovska, Ćetković

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Martinović	A 2	R 5	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Ćetković	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant:“Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad) 17

Respondent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 28

Group B:

Applicant:“Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Respondent: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

Judges: Marijan, Nikolovska, Ćetković

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Marijan	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Ćetković	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant:“Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 24

Respondent: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 21

Group C:

Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Respondent: “Universitas” (Tuzla)

Judges: Zupančič, Popović, Nikolovska

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Zupančič	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Popović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nikolovska	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 27

Respondent: “Universitas” (Tuzla) 18

Group C:

Applicant:“Universitas” (Tuzla)

Respondent: “Nasciturus” (Split)

Judges: Nenadić, Carić, Godžo

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nenadić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Carić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 3	R 0
Godžo	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Universitas” (Tuzla) 26

Respondent: “Nasciturus” (Split) 19

Group C:

Applicant:“Nasciturus” (Split)

Respondent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Judges: Zupančič, Popović, Bašić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Zupančič	A 2	R 5	A 1	R 4	A 1	R 2
Popović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Bašić	A 3	R 4	A 1	R 4	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Nasciturus” (Split) 15

Respondent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 30

Group D:

Applicant:“Iustitia” (Nis)

Respondent: “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica)

Judges: Martinović, Ćetković, Godžo

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Martinović	A 5	R 2	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Ćetković	A 5	R 2	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Godžo	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Iustitia” (Nis) 28

Respondent: “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica) 17

Group D:

Applicant: “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica)

Respondent: “Discretio” (Mostar)

Judges: Marijan, Carić, Nikolić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Marijan	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Carić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Nikolić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica) 24

Respondent: “Discretio” (Mostar) 21

Group D:

Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar)

Respondent: “Iustitia” (Nis)

Judges: Martinović, Nikolić, Godžo

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Nikolić	A 2	R 5	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Godžo	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar) 20

Respondent: “Iustitia” (Nis) 25

Final results in all groups/divisions

A

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 47 (better in briefs within the group)

Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 47 (Art.7C-seminalist)

Club “Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar) 41

B

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 52

Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad) 42 (Art.7C-semifinalist)

Club”Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 41

C

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 57

Club “Universitas” (Tuzla) 44

Club “Nasciturus” (Split) 34

D

Club “Iustitia” (Nis) 53

Club “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica) 41(better in briefs within the group)

Club “Discretio” (Mostar) 41

PART IV

Semi-final

(April 27)

Draw

Four best clubs from each group/divisions and two second-best clubs (Art. 7C) were participating in the semi-final. According to draw results, groups E and F were formed:

E

Club “Iustitia” (Nis)

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

F

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

Matches in semi-final groups

(April 27)

Group E:

Applicant:“Iustitia” (Nis)

Respondent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Judges: Carić, Godžo, Bašić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Carić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Godžo	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Bašić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant:“Iustitia” (Nis) 23

Respondent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 22

Group E:

Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Respondent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Judges: Carić, Nikolić, Ćetković

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Carić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Nikolić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Ćetković	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 21

Respondent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 24

Group E:

Applicant: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Respondent: “Iustitia” (Nis)

Judges: Martinović, Godžo, Nikolić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Godžo	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nikolić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 22

Respondent: “Iustitia” (Nis) 23

Group F:

Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Respondent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Judges: Nenadić, Ćetković, Nikolić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nenadić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Ćetković	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Nikolić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 22

Respondent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 23

Group F:

Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Respondent: “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

Judges: Marijan, Godžo, Bašić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Marijan	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Godžo	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Bašić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 22

Respondent: “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad) 23

Group F:

Applicant:“Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

Respondent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Judges: Zupančič, Bašić, Carić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Zupančič	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Bašić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Carić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad) 20

Respondent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 25

Final results in semi-final

E

Club “Iustitia” (Nis) 46 (better in briefs within the group)

Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 46

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 43

F

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 47

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 45

Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad) 43

PART V

Final

(April 27)

Applicant:“Iustitia” (Nis)

Respondent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Judges: Zupančič, Popović, Marijan, Nenadić, Martinović

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Zupančič	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Popović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Marijan	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nenadić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant:“Iustitia” (Nis) 43

Respondent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 32

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Respondent: “Iustitia” (Nis)

Judges: Zupančič, Popović, Marijan, Nenadić, Martinović

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Zupančič	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Popović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Marijan	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nenadić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 36

Respondent: “Iustitia” (Nis) 39

PART VI

The winner

The Club “Iustitia” from Niš is the winner of the Eighth Regional Moot Court Competition with 82 points, while “Vladimir Bayer” from Zagreb is the second with 68 points.

PART VII

The final results of the second part of the competition

1. Club “Iustitia” (Niš)

2. Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

3. Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

4. Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

5. Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)

6. Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

7. Club “Universitas”(Tuzla)

8. “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)

9. Club “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

10. “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar)

11. Club “Discretio” (Mostar)

12. Club “Nasciturus” (Split)

Belgrade, Secretary of the

Administrative Board

28 April 2014 Sumeja Tulić