The 9^th Regional Moot Court Competition

Herceg Novi, 24-27 April 2015

Official records

PART I

Grades for the written briefs

Club	City	Application	Response	Total	Place
Vladimir Bayer	Zagreb	38	37	75	1
Henrik Steska	Ljubljana	36	38	74	2
IUSTITIA	Niš	35,5	34,5	70	3
Veritas et Justitia	Tirana	36	33	69	4
Nasciturus	Split	31	32	63	5
Dr Radomir Lukić	Novi Sad	32	29	61	6
Iustiniana Prima	Skopje	29	31	60	7
Zoran Kompanjet	Rijeka	29.5	28.5	58	8
Gorgija	Zenica	31	26	57	9
Discretio	Mostar	28	28	56	10
IUDEX	Sarajevo	27	28	55	11
Gavro Vuković	Podgorica	27,5	26,5	54	12

PART II

Draw

According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Vladimir Bayer”, Zagreb (75) “Henrik Steska”, Ljubljana (74), “IUSTITIA”, Niš (70) and Club “Veritas et Justitia”, Tirana (69) were placed in the first box. After the first draw, Club “Vladimir Bayer”, Zagreb was selected for the leader of group A, club “Henrik Steska” Ljubljana was selected for the leader of group B, Club “Iustitia”, Nis for the leader of group C, and club “Veritas et Justitia”, Tirana for the leader of group D.

According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Nasciturus” Split (63), “Dr Radomir Lukic”, Novi Sad (61), “Iustiniana Prima”, Skopje (60), and “Zoran Kompanjet”, Rijeka (58) were placed in the second box. After the second draw Club “Zoran Kompanjet” Rijeka was selected for the group A, Club “Iustiniana Prima”, Skopje for the group B, club “Dr Radomir Lukic”, Novi Sad for the group C and club “Nasciturus” Split for the group D.

According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Gorgija”, Zenica (57), “Discretio”, Mostar (56), “IUDEX”, Sarajevo (55) and “Gavro Vukovic”, Podgorica (54) were placed in the third box. After the third draw Club “Discretio” Mostar was selected for the group A, Club “Gavro Vukovic”, Podgorica for the group B, club “IUDEX”, Sarajevo for the group C and club “Gorgija” Zenica for the group D.

Groups/divisions

A

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Club “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

Club “Discretio” (Mostar)

B

Club “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

C

Club “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana)

Club “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)

Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

D

Club ”Iustitia” (Niš)

Club “Nasciturus” (Split)

Club “Gorgija” (Zenica)

PART III

Matches in groups/divisions

(April 25)

Group A:

Applicant: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Respodent: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

Judges: Juras, Nenadić, Ribičić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Juras	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nenadić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Ribičić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 27

Respodent: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 18

Group A:

Applicant: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)

Respodent: “Discretio” (Mostar)

Judges: Đuranović, Ribičić, Begović

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Đuranović	A 4	R 2	A 3	R 3	A 2	R 1
Ribičić	A 4	R 2	A 3	R 3	A 1	R 2
Begović	A 4	R 2	A 3	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 23

Respodent: “Discretio” (Mostar) 22

Group A:

Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar)

Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Judges: Vujić, Martinović, Ribičić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Vujić	A 2	R 5	A 1	R 4	A 1	R 2
Martinović	A 2	R 5	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Ribičić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar) 15

Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 30

Group B:

Applicant: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)

Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Judges: Đuranović, Vujić, Briški

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Đuranović	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Vujić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Briški	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica) 22

Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 23

Group B:

Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Respodent: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)

Judges: Nenadić, Vujić, Briški

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nenadić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Vujić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Briški	A 5	R 2	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 25

Respodent: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica) 20

Group B:

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Respodent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Judges: Briški, Nenadić, Nikolovska

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Briški	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Nenadić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 20

Respodent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 25

Group C:

Applicant: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana)

Respodent: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)

Judges: Juras, Vujić, Kola

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Juras	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Vujić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Kola	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana) 22

Respodent: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 23

Group C:

Applicant:“Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)

Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Judges: Kola,Begović, Nikolovska

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Kola	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Begović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 20

Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 25

Group C:

Applicant: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)

Respodent: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana)

Judges: Martinović, Kola, Nikolovska

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Martinović	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Kola	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 21

Respodent: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana) 24

Group D:

Applicant: ”Iustitia” (Niš)

Respodent: “Nasciturus” (Split)

Judges: Begović, Martinović, Nikolovska

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Begović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: ”Iustitia” (Nis) 23

Respodent: “Nasciturus” (Split) 22

Group D:

Applicant: “Nasciturus” (Split)

Respodent: “Gorgija” (Zenica)

Judges: Martinović, Đuranović, Juras

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Đuranović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Juras	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Nasciturus” (Split) 24

Respodent: “Gorgija” (Zenica) 21

Group D:

Applicant: “Gorgija” (Zenica)

Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš)

Judges: Juras, Đuranović, Briški

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Juras	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Đuranović	A 2	R 5	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Briški	A 2	R 5	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Gorgija” (Zenica) 16

Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš) 29

Final results in all groups/divisions

A

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 57

Club “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 41 (briefs: 58)

Club “Discretio” (Mostar) 37

B

Club “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica) 42

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 43 (briefs:75)

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 50

C

Club “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana) 46 (briefs: 69)

Club “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 43

Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 46 (briefs: 55)

D

Club ”Iustitia” (Niš) 52

Club “Nasciturus” (Split) 46 (briefs: 63)

Club “Gorgija” (Zenica) 37

PART IV

Semi-final

(April 26)

Draw

Four best clubs from each group/divisions and two second-best clubs were participated in the semi-final. According to draw results, groups E and F were formed:

E

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Club “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana)

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

F

Club “Iustitia” (Niš)

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Club “Nasciturus” (Split)

Matches in semi-final groups

(April 26)

Group E:

Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Respodent: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana)

Judges: Kola, Carić, Ribičić

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Kola	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Carić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Ribičić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 25

Respodent: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana) 20

Group E:

Applicant: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana)

Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Judges: Kola, Carić, Juras

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Kola	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Carić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Juras	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana) 23

Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 22

Group E:

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)

Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Judges: Nenadić, Ribičić, Juras

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nenadić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Ribičić	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Juras	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 23

Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 22

Group F:

Applicant: “Iustitia” (Niš)

Respodent: “ Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Judges: Begović, Martinović, Đuranović

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Begović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Đuranović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “Iustitia” (Niš) 23

Respodent: “ Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 22

Group F:

Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)

Respodent: “Nasciturus” (Split)

Judges: Nikolovska, Vujić, Briški

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Nikolovska	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Vujić	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2
Briški	A 4	R 3	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant: “ Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 23

Respodent: “Nasciturus” (Split) 22

Group F:

Applicant: “Nasciturus” (Split)

Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš)

Judges: Đuranović, Govedarica. Briški

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Đuranović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Govedarica	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Briški	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Nasciturus” (Split) 22

Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš) 23

Final results in semi-final

Group E

Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 47

Club “Veritas et Justitia” (Tirana) 43

Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 45

Group F

Club “Iustitia” (Niš) 46

Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 45

Club “Nasciturus” (Split) 44

PART V

Finals

(April 27)

Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš)

Judges: Ribičič, Nenadić, Nikolovska, Begović, Martinović

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Ribičič	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nenadić	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 1	R 2
Nikolovska	A 5	R 2	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Begović	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Martinović	A 3	R 4	A 3	R 2	A 1	R 2

Total:

Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 39

Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš) 36

Applicant: “Iustita” (Niš)

Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)

Judges: Ribičič, Nenadić, Nikolovska, Begović, Martinović

Judge	Argumentation		Performance		Answer
Ribičič	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Nenadić	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Nikolovska	A 3	R 4	A 2	R 3	A 2	R 1
Begović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1
Martinović	A 4	R 3	A 3	R 2	A 2	R 1

Total:

Applicant: “Iustita” (Nip) 41

Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 34

PART VI

The winner

The Club “Iustitia” from Niš is the winner of the Ninth Regional Moot Court Competition with 77 points, while “Henrik Steska” from Ljubljana is the second with 73 points.

Herceg Novi, Secretary of the

Administrative Board

27 April 2015 Goran Miletić