
The Sixth Regional Moot Court Competition
Sarajevo, 20-22 April 2012
Official records
PART I
Grades for the written briefs
Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)
Applicant: 39 State: 40 Total: 79
Club “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)
Applicant: 36 State: 38 Total: 74
Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)
Applicant: 36 State: 38 Total: 74
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Applicant: 37 State: 33 Total: 70
Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Applicant: 34 State: 34 Total: 68
Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Applicant: 33 State: 32 Total: 65
Club “Iustitita” (Nis)
Applicant: 32 State: 33 Total: 65
Club “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica)
Applicant: 31 State: 31 Total: 62
Club “Discretio” (Mostar)
Applicant: 30 State: 31 Total: 61
Club “Dzemal Bijedic” (Mostar)
Applicant: 32 State: 28 Total: 60
Club “Nasciturus” (Split)
Applicant: 30 State: 30 Total: 60
Club “Abea” (Banjaluka)
Applicant: 29 State: 28 Total: 57
PART II
Draw
According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Henrik Steska”, Ljubljana (79), “Zoran Kompanjet”, Rijeka (74), “Radomir Lukić”, Novi Sad (74) and Club “Vladimir Bayer”, Zagreb (70) were placed in the first box. After the first draw Club “Vladimir Bayer” Zagreb was selected for the leader of group A, Club “Zoran Kompanjet”, Rijeka for the leader of group B, club “Henrik Steska”, Ljubljana for the leader of group C and club “Radomir Lukić” Novi Sad for the leader of group D.
According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Iudex”, Sarajevo (68), “Iustiniana Prima”, Skopje (65), “Iustita”, Nis (65) and “Gavro Vukovic”, Podgorica (62) were placed in the second box. After the second draw Club “Iustiniana Prima” Skopje was selected for the group A, Club “Iudex”, Sarajevo for the group B, club “Iustitia”, Nis for the group C and club “Gavro Vuković” Podgorica for the group D.
According to written briefs grades, Clubs “Discretio”, Mostar (61), “Džemal Bijedić”, Mostar (60), “Nasciturus”, Split (60) and “ABEA”, Banjaluka (57) were placed in the third box. After the third draw Club “Nasciturus” Split was selected for the group A, Club “ABEA”, Banjaluka for the group B, club “Džemal Bijedić”, Mostar for the group C and club “Discretio” Mostar for the group D.
Groups/divisions
A
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Club “Nasciturus” (Split)
B
Club”Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)
Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Club “ABEA” (Banjaluka)
C
Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)
Club “Iustitia” (Niš)
Club “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar)
D
Club “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)
Club “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)
Club “Discretio” (Mostar)
PART III
Matches in groups/divisions
(April 21)
Group A:
Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Respodent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Judges: Trajkovska, Vehabović,Nenadić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Trajkovska |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Vehabović |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Nenadić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 9
Respodent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 9
Group A:
Applicant:“Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Respodent: “Nasciturus” (Split)
Judges: Nikolovska, Marijan, Nenadić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Nikolovska |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Marijan |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Nenadić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant:“Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 9
Respodent: “Nasciturus” (Split) 9
Group A:
Applicant:“Nasciturus” (Split)
Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Judges: Vehabović, Katušić, Marijan
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Vehabović |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Katušić |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Marijan |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant:“Nasciturus” (Split) 6
Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 12 (+2 bonus points) = 14
Group B:
Applicant:“Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)
Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Judges: Nikolovska,Marijan, Martinovic
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Nikolovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Marijan |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 2 |
R 0 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Martinovic |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant:“Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 8
Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 10 (+2 bonus points) = 12
Group B:
Applicant:“Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Respodent: “ABEA” (Banjaluka)
Judges: Trajkovska, Vehabović; Katušić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Trajkovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Vehabović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Katušić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant:“Iudex” (Sarajevo) 9
Respodent: “ABEA” (Banjaluka) 9
Group B:
Applicant:“ABEA” (Banjaluka)
Respodent: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)
Judges: Trajkovska, Đuranovic, Nenadić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Trajkovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Đuranović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Nenadić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant:“ABEA” (Banjaluka) 10 + 2 bonus points = 12
Respodent: “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 8
Group C:
Applicant:“Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)
Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš)
Judges: Zupancic, Pažin, Dičić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Zupancic |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Pažin |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Dičić |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 6
Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš) 12+2 bonus points = 14
Group C:
Applicant:“Iustitia” (Niš)
Respodent: “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar)
Judges: Zupancic, Pažin, Katušić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Zupancic |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 2 |
R 0 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Pažin |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Katušić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant: “Iustitia” (Niš) 12+2 bonus points = 14
Respodent: “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar) 6
Group C:
Applicant:“Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar)
Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)
Judges: Zupancic, Pažin, Martinović
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Zupancic |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Pažin |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Martinović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant: “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar) 10+2 bonus points = 12
Respodent: “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 8
Group D:
Applicant:“Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)
Respodent: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)
Judges: Pazin, Mostovac, Nikolovska
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Nikolovska |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Martinović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Vukoje |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 12 (+2 bonus points) = 14
Respodent: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica) 6
Group D:
Applicant: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica)
Respodent: “Discretio” (Mostar)
Judges: Đuranović, Dičić, Vukoje
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Đuranović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Dičić |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Vukoje |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant: “Gavro Vuković” (Podgorica) 8
Respodent: “Discretio” (Mostar) 10 (+2 bonus points) = 12
Group D:
Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar)
Respodent: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)
Judges: Đuranović, Dičić, Vukoje
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Đuranović |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Dičić |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Vukoje |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar) 7
Respodent: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 11 (+2 bonus points) = 13
Final results in all groups/divisions
A
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 23
Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 18
Club “Nasciturus” 15
B
Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 21 + 1 *rule 9(6)
Club “ABEA” (Banjaluka) 21
Club “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka) 16
According to Rules of procedure, Article 9 (6), club “Iudex” was awarded with extra point, thanks to better score on written briefs.
C
Club “Iustitia” (Niš) 28
Club “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar) 18
Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana) 14
D
Club “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 27
Club “Disrectio” (Mostar) 19
Club “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica) 14
The best teams in each group were qualified for the semi-final. Apart from them, two more teams are qualified according to Article 7 (C) . Teams at the second place in each groups were:
“Iustiniana Prima”, Skopje, 18 points + 32.5 (half of points in written briefs) = 50.5
“ABEA”, Banjaluka, 21 points + 28.5 (half of points in written briefs) = 49.5
“Džemal Bijedić”, Mostar 18 points + 30 (half of points in written briefs) = 48
“Discretio”, Mostar 19 points + 30.5 (half of points in written briefs) = 49.5
According to this, club “Iustiniana Prima” Skopje was qualified for the semi-final, while draw was organized for the teams “ABEA” (Banjaluka) and “Discretio” (Mostar). According to draw, club “Discretio” Mostar become semi-finalist.
PART IV
Semi-final
(April 22)
Draw
Four best clubs from each group/divisions and two second-best clubs were participated in the semi-final. According to draw results, groups E and F were formed:
E
Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
F
Club “Iustitia” (Nis)
Club “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)
Club “Discretio” (Mostar)
Matches in semi-final groups
(April 22)
Group E:
Applicant:“Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Judges: Marijan, Vehabović, Carić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Marijan |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 2 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Vehabović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Carić |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant:“Iudex” (Sarajevo) 9
Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 9
Group E:
Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Respodent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Judges: Nenadic, Marijan, Nikolovska
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Nenadić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Marijan |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Nikolovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 9
Respodent: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 9
Group E:
Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo)
Judges: Trajkovska, Vehabovic, Caric
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Trajkovska |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Vehabovic |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Caric |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant: “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 9
Respodent: “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 9
Group F:
Applicant:“Iustitia” (Niš)
Respodent: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)
Judges: Katušić, Dičić, Đuranović
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Katušić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Dičić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Đuranović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant:“Iustitia” (Niš) 11 (+ 2 bonus points) = 13
Respodent: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 7
Group F:
Applicant: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad)
Respodent: “Discretio” (Mostar)
Judges: Katušić, Dičić, Vehabović
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Katušić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Dičić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Vehabović |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant: “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 11+2 bonus points = 13
Respodent: “Discretio” (Mostar) 7
Group F:
Applicant:“Discretio” (Mostar)
Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš)
Judges: Martinović, Pažin, Nenadić
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Martinović |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Pažin |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Nenadić |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant: “Discretio” (Mostar) 7
Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš) 11 (+2 bonus points) = 13
Final results in semi-final
E
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 18
Club “Iudex” (Sarajevo) 18
Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje) 18
F
Club “Iustitia” (Nis) 26
Club “Radomir Lukić” (Novi Sad) 20
Club “Discretio” (Mostar) 14
PART V
Final
(April 22)
Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš)
Judges: Zupancic, Marijan, Carić, Nikolovska, Trajkovska
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Zupancic |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 2 |
R 0 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Trajkovska |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Nikolovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Marijan |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Carić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Total:
Applicant:“Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 16
Respodent: “Iustitia” (Niš) 14
Applicant: “Iustitia” (Niš)
Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Judges: Zupancic, Marijan, Carić, Nikolovska, Trajkovska
Judge |
Argumentation |
Performance |
Answer |
|||
Zupancic |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Trajkovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Nikolovska |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 0 |
R 1 |
Marijan |
A 1 |
R 2 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Carić |
A 2 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 1 |
A 1 |
R 0 |
Total:
Applicant: “Iustitia” (Nis) 13
Respodent: “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 17
PART VI
The winner
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb) 33
Club “Iustitia” (Niš) 27
Consequently, the Club “Vladimir Bayer” from Zagreb is the winner of the sixth Regional Moot Court Competition.
PART VII
The final results of the second part of the competition
Club “Vladimir Bayer” (Zagreb)
Club “Iustitia” (Nis)
Club “Radomir Lukic” (Novi Sad)
Club “Iudex”(Sarajevo)
Club “Iustiniana Prima” (Skopje)
Club “Discretio” (Mostar)
“ABEA” (Banjaluka)
Club “Džemal Bijedić” (Mostar)
Club “Zoran Kompanjet” (Rijeka)
Club “Nasciturus” (Split)
Club “Henrik Steska” (Ljubljana)
Club “Gavro Vukovic” (Podgorica)
Stockholm, Secretary of the
Administrative Board
27 April 2012 Goran Miletić